Mastery of Command in the Emergency Department (RCEM SLO 8)

 

Mastery of Command in the Emergency Department (RCEM SLO 8)

Executive Summary

This document provides a comprehensive synthesis of the core principles, strategic frameworks, and practical requirements for mastering the Royal College of Emergency Medicine (RCEM) Speciality Learning Outcome (SLO) 8, "Lead the ED Shift." Achievement of SLO 8 signifies the critical transition of a technically proficient clinician into a strategic system operator, capable of ensuring departmental safety, efficiency, and quality of care.

Key Takeaways:

• The System Operator Mandate: SLO 8 is the capstone leadership outcome, requiring the integration of clinical acumen with high-level operational command. The focus shifts from individual patient care to managing the entire department's capacity, patient flow, and risk portfolio (3, 4).
• Proactive Shift Preparation: Effective leadership begins before the shift starts. This includes personal fatigue mitigation strategies rooted in shift work science and leading a structured, multidisciplinary daily safety huddle to establish a shared mental model and proactively identify risks (8, 10).
• Operational Command and Flow Management: The primary operational duty is managing patient flow to mitigate the known harms of overcrowding (12). This is achieved through maintaining situational awareness via well-designed Visual Management Boards (VMBs), implementing tactical flow interventions (e.g., streaming, case management), and utilising system-wide metrics like "Clinically Ready to Proceed" (16, 17, Source 2).
• Tactical Leadership in Resuscitation: In high-acuity scenarios, the leader must embody the "Director, Not Doer" principle. By stepping back from performing procedures, the Trauma Team Leader (TTL) preserves the cognitive capacity required for strategic oversight, decision-making, and effective team coordination (20).
• Primacy of Non-Technical Skills (NTS): Mastery of NTS—including situational awareness, structured communication (SBAR), closed-loop delegation, and strategic team leadership—is the foundation of patient safety and high performance (23, 27).
• Crisis and Escalation Management: The shift leader must be proficient in activating predefined escalation policies during periods of severe crowding and leading the department through major incidents. This requires a structured approach (e.g., the SELF, SPACE, STAFF, STUFF, SPECIALTIES, SAFETY, SYSTEM mnemonic) and the ability to navigate the ethical complexities of transitioning to crisis standards of care (32, 34, Source 2).
• Evidencing Mastery: Competency must be documented through a robust portfolio of evidence, including workplace-based assessments and, critically, high-quality reflective practice that demonstrates leadership in systemic and quality improvement initiatives (37, 38).

1. The Mandate for ED Shift Leadership: RCEM SLO 8

1.1. Defining the System Operator

Mastery of Speciality Learning Outcome (SLO) 8, "Lead the ED Shift," is a continuous requirement from Intermediate training onwards and represents the definitive marker of a competent senior Emergency Medicine doctor (1). It confirms the clinician's transition from a technical expert to a comprehensive system operator, responsible for the safe and effective functioning of the entire Emergency Department (ED) (3).

This capstone SLO is assessed across five critical domains of the RCEM curriculum (2):

• Domain 1: Professional values and behaviours
• Domain 2: Professional skills
• Domain 5: Capabilities in leadership and team-working
• Domain 6: Capabilities in patient safety and quality improvement
• Domain 7: Capabilities in safeguarding vulnerable groups

The core function of the shift leader is to maintain constant situational awareness, anticipate challenges, generate viable options, make definitive decisions, and communicate these effectively to the multidisciplinary team (MDT) (2). This requires a strategic shift in focus from executing individual clinical tasks to managing the department’s overall capacity, patient flow, and risk portfolio (4).

1.2. Entrustment and Progression

The curriculum defines clear entrustment milestones for leadership progression:

• End of Intermediate Training (Level 3): At this stage, a trainee is expected to have an awareness of team workload, provide support to other staff members, and be entrusted to function as the senior clinician in the ED overnight.
• End of Higher Speciality Training (Level 4): By the completion of training, the specialist is expected to maintain situational awareness at all times, manage departmental handovers, utilise appropriate delegation and prioritisation, optimise ED flow with knowledge of escalation policies, and be fully entrusted to lead the shift (Source 2).

1.3. Core Competencies and Descriptors

Mastery of SLO 8 requires demonstrated capability in managing common but challenging situations that test the leader's grasp of operational safety, ethics, and law. Key required descriptors include (2, Source 2):

• Safety and Conflict: Knowing how to safely de-escalate and manage violent or threatening situations.
• Medico-Legal Proficiency: Expertly handling capacity assessments, managing self-discharge against medical advice, responding to adult safeguarding issues, and managing enquiries from the Police or Forensic Medical Examiners (FME).
• Legal and Ethical Conduct: Maintaining awareness of national legislation for vulnerable groups and consistently behaving in accordance with ethical and legal requirements.
• Professionalism and Communication: Demonstrating the ability to offer an apology or explanation when appropriate (duty of candour) and liaising effectively with hospital and external colleagues, particularly during challenging patient handovers.

2. Strategic Preparation and Proactive Command

2.1. Personal Performance and Fatigue Mitigation

The professional responsibility to lead safely extends to meticulous personal performance maintenance. The physiological impact of disturbed circadian rhythms on cognitive functions like alertness, speed, and accuracy is significant (7). To mitigate fatigue-related risk, leaders must integrate shift work science into personal resilience planning. Best practices include (8):

• Rotating shifts in a clockwise manner (day → evening → night).
• Avoiding overly long shifts or extended stretches of night shifts.

2.2. The Pre-Shift Safety Huddle

The pre-shift safety huddle is a non-negotiable process for establishing collective situational awareness and aligning the MDT (9). The huddle should include representatives from medical, nursing, administrative, and specialist support staff (10). A structured framework, such as the ECAT Safety Huddle Script, divides the process into three critical phases (10):

Phase	Focus	Key Actions and Outputs
Looking Back	Learning & Continuity	Briefly review the previous shift's successes and challenges; identify outstanding tasks or safety concerns requiring follow-up.
Looking Forward	Risk Prediction	Proactively scan for risks by reviewing current capacity, occupancy, patient acuity, and workforce skill mix. Address equipment or process issues.
Finalise	Accountability & Goals	Assign accountability for follow-up on identified risks. Set clear, definitive expectations and team goals for the shift.

2.3. Standardising Handover for Safety

The transfer of patient care during handover is a recognised patient safety risk. Breakdown in communication is a major contributing factor in a high percentage of malpractice cases (Source 2). To mitigate this risk, NICE recommends the use of standardised, structured handover processes. The SBAR tool is the preferred method for individual patient handovers to ensure critical information is transferred and retained accurately (Source 2).

3. Operational Command: Managing Departmental Flow

The ED perpetually operates at "the edge of chaos," and a primary responsibility of the shift leader is to manage this by strategically regulating patient flow (Input, Throughput, and Output) (4). Poor patient flow and overcrowding are directly linked to lower quality of care and worse patient outcomes (12).

3.1. Situational Awareness and the Visual Management Board (VMB)

The VMB, often called "the ED Grid" or "Flow Board," is the leader's primary cognitive tool for maintaining high-level situational awareness in a highly interruptible environment (2, 4). For a VMB to be effective, it must adhere to four core principles: being Simple, Big, Visible, and Changeable (17). Critically, the status of the information displayed must be understandable by the entire team in less than five seconds and use colour coding to distinguish safe from unsafe conditions (18).

3.2. Tactical Flow Interventions

To improve throughput and manage flow, the shift leader must actively employ evidence-based interventions, including (14, 15, 16):

• Streaming and Fast-Track: Stratifying patients at triage into different treatment pathways (e.g., a split-flow model) to match resources to needs.
• Operational Efficiency: Ensuring staff skill mix is optimised to meet demand patterns and that equipment is easy to find, preventing wasted time.
• Case Management: Integrating care coordinators or case managers who are highly effective at identifying and correcting system-wide barriers to patient flow, assisting with discharge planning, and reducing ED length of stay (12, 16).

3.3. System-Wide Metrics and Escalation

With the abandonment of the 4-hour target, new metrics are essential to encourage patient movement. The "Clinically Ready to Proceed" (CRTP) timestamp is a key measure designed to facilitate patient 'pull' from inpatient wards, with a goal of transfer within one hour of the timestamp being applied (Source 2). Crowding is a system-wide problem, not an ED-specific one (13). Therefore, local departments may use a "barometer tool" to identify critical capacity levels, which then triggers standardised escalation procedures involving a coordinated, system-wide response (Source 2).

4. Tactical Leadership in Clinical Scenarios

4.1. Resuscitation Command: The "Director, Not Doer" Principle

During high-acuity trauma resuscitations, the Trauma Team Leader (TTL) must operate with decisive command (19). Leadership begins upon notification with a pre-arrival team briefing, using a checklist to introduce team members, allocate roles, and define the initial plan (19, 20).

A fundamental principle of effective resuscitation leadership is the strategic separation of command from technical execution. The TTL maintains situational awareness from a position at the foot of the bed and, to preserve cognitive capacity for complex decision-making, will not perform procedures (20). This conscious withdrawal from technical tasks is a hallmark of leadership maturity (D5). The TTL's role is to direct the resuscitation, manage fluid and blood products, delegate tasks, and enforce strict noise control to ensure clear communication (20).

4.2. Coordinating Critical Care Pathways

The shift leader is responsible for ensuring the effective use of protocols for time-sensitive, non-trauma critical conditions like sepsis, stroke, and major haemorrhage (3, 21). This involves enforcing adherence to standardised clinical pathways, often facilitated by templated order sets, and requires proactive liaison with ICU and inpatient teams to ensure a coordinated institutional response (22). This leadership extends to knowing when to escalate care and when to initiate discussions about realistic goals of care (3).

4.3. Defining Scope and Managing Workload

Effective leadership requires defining the scope of emergency medicine practice to focus on life-threatening conditions (the "dangerous wheel of diagnosis") and ensure sensible resource stewardship. Using frameworks from resources like the ER CAST podcast ("Order out of Chaos") can help leaders manage their personal workload and create order within the dynamic ED environment (Source 2).

5. Non-Technical Skills: The Foundation of Effective Leadership

Non-Technical Skills (NTS) are the cognitive and social abilities that support technical skills and serve as a critical defence against human error (23). For the ED shift leader, mastery of NTS is synonymous with high-level performance in leadership (D5) and patient safety (D6).

5.1. Structured Communication: SBAR and Closed-Loop Delegation

Structured communication is the cornerstone of patient safety.

• SBAR (Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendation): This framework provides a concise and clear tool for information sharing, especially during critical handovers (27). It empowers all team members to speak up effectively.

Element	Definition and Purpose	Example (IECOPD Handover)
Situation	State the immediate problem, including patient and sender identity.	"A 74M presents with 2/7 increasing SOB & Wheeze... lowest SaO2 69%..."
Background	Provide relevant clinical context, history, and results.	"He is known to have severe COPD & is still smoking."
Assessment	State your clinical interpretation of the problem.	"Findings... are consistent with IECOPD, His CRP is 100 and febrile..."
Recommendation	Make a clear request for the specific action needed.	"A bed has been requested... Outstanding actions to chase are his ongoing response to therapy, CXR, and ensure antibiotics are given."

• Closed-Loop Delegation: In high-acuity settings, all directives must use a closed-loop mechanism: the sender gives a clear directive, the receiver repeats it back, and the sender confirms accuracy before the task is performed (27).

5.2. Strategic Delegation

Effective delegation frees the leader to focus on high-level command functions. It is a systematic process that requires (28, 29, 30):

1. Matching Skill to Task: Understanding team member strengths to set them up for success.
2. Transferring Authority: Granting the necessary decision-making power to execute the task, not just the task itself.
3. Providing Context and Resources: Explaining the strategic importance of the task and ensuring the delegate has the time, tools, and support needed.

Advanced leadership involves using delegation as a deliberate tool for professional development and workforce capacity building, rather than simply offloading routine work (29).

6. Managing Crisis, Conflict, and Medico-Legal Challenges

6.1. ED Crowding and Surge Escalation

When flow interventions are insufficient, the shift leader must activate predefined escalation policies (31). Immediate actions to manage a capacity surge include (32):

• Alerting senior clinicians and operational managers across the hospital.
• Initiating proactive discharges from all wards ("check, chase, challenge").
• Opening additional acute staffed beds and reviewing non-urgent elective care for deferral.
• Implementing a 'pull' policy to reduce boarding time.

6.2. A Framework for Crisis Response

In a critical capacity event, such as an OSCE scenario or a real-life crisis, a structured approach is essential. The following mnemonic can be used to organise an action plan (Source 2):

• SELF: Personal readiness and control.
• SPACE: Where can patients be managed?
• STAFF: Who is available and what is their skill mix?
• STUFF: Are resources and equipment adequate?
• SPECIALTIES: What external support is needed?
• SAFETY: What are the immediate risks and mitigations?
• SYSTEM: How does this impact the wider hospital?

6.3. Major Incidents and Crisis Standards of Care

During a mass casualty event (MCE), the leader must oversee the transition from conventional to crisis standards of care (34). This requires difficult operational adjustments (e.g., shifting to 12-hour schedules, decanting the ED, using non-clinical areas) and brings profound ethical challenges (34, 35). The leader has a professional duty to involve the organisation’s legal and ethical counsel, ensure clear documentation plans are in place, and address the significant moral distress and welfare needs of the staff (33, 35).

7. Evidencing Competency for Professional Progression

7.1. Portfolio Development for ARCP

Achieving SLO 8 requires documenting capabilities for the Annual Review of Competency Progression (ARCP) (36). Evidence should be gathered from a range of sources, including Workplace Based Assessments (WPBA), e-learning modules, multi-source feedback (MSF), simulation, and both solicited and unsolicited shop-floor feedback (37, Source 2). While not mandatory for upload, maintaining a patient or shift log is a critical tool for guiding discussions with an Educational Supervisor about the complexity and volume of shifts led (37).

7.2. High-Quality Leadership Reflection

Reflection for SLO 8 must transcend standard clinical case analysis. High-quality evidence for leadership focuses on systemic and organisational change, aligning with the capabilities of Domain 5 (Leadership) and Domain 6 (Patient Safety/QI) (38). An exemplary reflection would detail how the leader identified a systemic issue (e.g., inconsistent safeguarding documentation) and led a change process to implement a more robust workflow, thereby demonstrating the ability to anticipate challenges and optimise safety (2, 38).

References

1. Specialty Learning Outcomes - RCEMCurriculum, https://rcemcurriculum.co.uk/speciality-learning-outcomes/
2. SLO 8 - Lead the ED shift - RCEMCurriculum, https://rcemcurriculum.co.uk/lead-the-ed-shift/
3. RCEM SLOs Explained: The Key to Mastering Emergency Medicine - EM Learning Centre, https://www.emlearningcentre.com/blog/rcem-slos-explained-the-key-to-mastering-emergency-medicine
4. Leading and managing an emergency department—A personal view - PubMed Central, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7147188/
5. Managing Multidisciplinary Teams in Healthcare: 5 Best Practices - IntelyCare, https://www.intelycare.com/facilities/resources/utilizing-a-multidisciplinary-team-5-best-practices-for-facilities/
6. Job Title Risk and Patient Safety Lead - Trac, https://apps.trac.jobs/documents?vdoc=9064775
7. How to Design the Optimal Schedule for Working Shifts | ACEP, https://www.acep.org/life-as-a-physician/residents--young-physicians/professional-skills/how-to-design-the-optimal-schedule-for-working-shifts
8. Emergency Physician Shift Work | ACEP, https://www.acep.org/patient-care/policy-statements/emergency-physician-shift-work
9. Supplemental Guide Template - ACGME, https://www.acgme.org/globalassets/pdfs/milestones/pediatricemergencymedicinesupplementalguidetemplate.docx
10. ECAT Emergency Department Safety Huddle Script Template - Agency for Clinical Innovation, https://aci.health.nsw.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0009/946062/ECAT-Safety-Huddle-Script.pdf
11. ED-Hospital Throughput Best Practices - Health Services Cost Review Commission (HSCRC), https://hscrc.maryland.gov/Documents/Best%20Practices%20Meeting%20Jan%2030%2C%202025.pdf
12. Streamlining patient flow and enhancing operational efficiency through case management implementation - PMC - PubMed Central, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10910643/
13. Project reset in emergency medicine: Patient FIRST - HSE, https://www.hse.ie/eng/about/who/national-services/patient-flow-academy/patient-flow-resources/care-quality-commission-cqc-project-reset-in-emergency-medicine-patient-first.pdf
14. Strategies to Measure and Improve Emergency Department Performance: A Review - PMC, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10890971/
15. 7 Tips to Improve Patient Flow in Hospitals - CenTrak, https://centrak.com/resources/blog/increase-patient-flow
16. Emergency Department Crowding: High Impact Solutions - ACEP, https://www.acep.org/siteassets/sites/acep/media/crowding/empc_crowding-ip_092016.pdf
17. Visual Management Checklist - GoLeanSixSigma.com (GLSS), https://goleansixsigma.com/visual-management-checklist/
18. Visual Management Board Checklist | Engineering Possibilities, https://engineeringpossibilities.ca/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/Visual-Management-Checklist.pdf
19. Trauma team roles and responsibilities - The Royal Children's Hospital, https://www.rch.org.au/trauma-service/manual/Trauma_team_roles_and_responsibilities/
20. trauma-roles.pdf, https://hsc.unm.edu/medicine/departments/emergency-medicine/_docs/edru/trauma-roles.pdf
21. ED Pathway - HealthStream, https://www.healthstream.com/solution/clinical-development/competency-development/ed-pathway
22. Hospital Sepsis Program Core Elements - CDC, https://www.cdc.gov/sepsis/hcp/core-elements/index.html
23. Non-technical Skills in Healthcare - Textbook of Patient Safety and Clinical Risk Management - NCBI, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK585613/
24. Non-Technical Skills in Healthcare: a Pilot Study - Herald Scholarly Open Access, https://www.heraldopenaccess.us/openaccess/non-technical-skills-in-healthcare-a-pilot-study
25. Training Leaders in Trauma Resuscitation: Teacher and Learner Perspectives on Ideal Methods - NIH, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8967462/
26. DELEGATION AND SUPERVISION - Nursing Management and Professional Concepts - NCBI Bookshelf, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK610432/
27. Tool: SBAR | Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, https://www.ahrq.gov/teamstepps-program/curriculum/communication/tools/sbar.html
28. Four ways to effectively delegate | CSU - Charleston Southern University, https://www.charlestonsouthern.edu/four-ways-to-effectively-delegate/
29. Effective Delegation Framework: Shift Management Best Practices - myshyft.com, https://www.myshyft.com/blog/delegation-guidelines/
30. How to delegate effectively: 10 delegation tips for leaders - Asana, https://asana.com/resources/how-to-delegate
31. Emergency Department Capacity Management Guidance - The Scottish Government, https://www.gov.scot/binaries/content/documents/govscot/publications/advice-and-guidance/2016/08/emergency-department-capacity-management-guidance/documents/00503929-pdf/00503929-pdf/govscot%3Adocument/00503929.pdf
32. Emergency department capacity management: guidance - gov.scot - The Scottish Government, https://www.gov.scot/publications/emergency-department-capacity-management-guidance-2/pages/5/
33. Guidelines for Managing Hospital Surge Capacity - PERSI, https://persi.or.id/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/guidelines_for_hsc.pdf
34. Preparing your emergency department for disaster: Optimizing surge capacity during mass casualty events - PMC - NIH, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10895895/
35. Staffing Considerations for Surge Planning and Emergency Response - American Nurses Association, https://www.nursingworld.org/globalassets/covid19/final-ana-document-csc-staffing-guidance-4.22.21.pdf
36. DRE-EM (Defined Route of Entry into Emergency Medicine) TRAINING PROGRAMME HANDBOOK 2025-26, https://heeoe.hee.nhs.uk/sites/default/files/dre-em_handbook.eoe_.june2025_0.pdf
37. Educational Supervisor Guide to RCEM Curriculum 2021, https://rcemcurriculum.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Educational-Supervisor-Guide-to-RCEM-Curriculum-2021.pdf
38. Reflective Template: Quality Improvement Activity, https://www.appraisal.nes.scot.nhs.uk/media/l3xdgcdt/reflection-leadership-role.doc

------------------------------------------------------------------

MEM-EM PODCAST

2.8 Lead the ED shift

                                                                         Apple podcast

Spotify Podcast

Amazon Music 

  You Tube Music Podcasts

  

Crowding and flow in the ED

 

Emergency Department Flow & Crowding: A Practical Guide to Escalation and Safety

Executive Summary

Emergency Department (ED) crowding is not an operational inconvenience but a persistent, state of active patient harm and a marker of systemic failure in health policy and leadership. It represents a significant threat to the timely and safe delivery of emergency care within the UK's National Health Service (NHS). This document synthesizes evidence and expert guidance to provide NHS Emergency Medicine clinicians with practical, evidence-based strategies for managing crowded environments, articulating clinical risk, and escalating effectively to restore patient safety.

The primary driver of ED crowding is exit block—the inability to move admitted patients from the ED to inpatient beds due to a lack of hospital capacity. This systemic failure, rooted in a severe mismatch between demand and available staffed beds and social care, creates a dangerous "vicious circle" where delays lead to patient deterioration, further increasing admissions and exacerbating crowding.

The consequences are severe and quantifiable. Studies demonstrate a direct, linear relationship between delays to admission and patient mortality. Data from the Getting it Right First Time (GIRFT) report shows that for every 67-82 patients delayed in the ED for 6-12 hours, there is one excess death. This harm extends to delayed critical treatments, increased medication errors, and profound moral injury and burnout among staff, threatening the sustainability of the Emergency Medicine workforce.

Effective management requires a shift in mindset and language: from describing "risk" to declaring "harm," and from viewing crowding as an "ED problem" to articulating it as a "corporate safety failure." This guide provides clinicians with the necessary tools, including specific escalation scripts, in-department safety protocols, and whole-system flow strategies like the Full Capacity Protocol (FCP) and Continuous Flow Models. By mastering these strategies, clinicians can move from passively absorbing systemic risk to actively and professionally compelling a hospital-wide response to regain safety for both patients and staff.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Definition and Classification of ED Crowding

Definition

Emergency Department crowding is a state that occurs when the demand for emergency services exceeds the capacity of the department, the hospital, or the wider health system to provide quality care within an appropriate timeframe [1]. It is a complex, system-wide problem that manifests visibly as ambulance handover delays, patients treated in corridors and non-clinical spaces ("corridor care"), and prolonged waits for assessment, treatment, and admission [2, 3].

Crucially, crowding must be understood and articulated not as a "risk" of future problems but as a state of active, ongoing harm. The environment of a crowded ED is clinically toxic, directly causing demonstrable negative outcomes for patients and staff [3, 4].

Classification: The Input-Throughput-Output Model

The causes and potential interventions for crowding are best understood using the Input-Throughput-Output model. To underscore the priorities for effective solutions, this model should be considered in reverse order of importance [3]:

1. Output (Highest Priority): This refers to the process of patients leaving the ED. The primary cause of crowding is failure at this stage, known as exit block or access block. This is the inability of admitted patients to be transferred to an inpatient ward due to a lack of available staffed beds in the hospital. Solutions are primarily the responsibility of hospital and system-level leadership [3, 8].
2. Throughput: This encompasses all processes within the ED, from patient arrival to disposition. It is influenced by departmental staffing, physical space, process efficiency, and access to diagnostics. While ED teams have some control here, improvements are severely limited by the presence of exit block [3, 8].
3. Input: This describes the demand for ED services, including patient arrival patterns and the effectiveness of alternative care pathways in the community. While often a focus for health policy, there is little evidence that input-focused interventions have a meaningful impact on the harm resulting from ED crowding [3, 9].

This model highlights that crowding is not an "ED problem" but a "system problem" with its locus of failure outside the ED's direct control.

The Four Harms of Poor Urgent Care Flow

The systemic nature of crowding is illustrated by the concept of the "four harms," a cascade of delays where failure in one part of the system directly impacts the others [10]:

1. Harm 4: Delay to disposition from a ward for patients who no longer require inpatient care.
2. Harm 3: Delay to admission from the ED.
3. Harm 2: Delay to initial assessment in the ED and the offloading of ambulances.
4. Harm 1: Delay to disposition for patients contacting emergency services (999/111).

This framework clarifies that delays experienced at the "front door" of the hospital are a direct consequence of failures at the "back door" [10].

Epidemiology & Aetiology

Incidence and Predominance

ED crowding has steadily worsened over the past decade in the UK, moving from a seasonal "winter crisis" to a year-round state of emergency [1, 11].

• Attendances: In 2019/20, there were over 19 million attendances to Type 1 EDs across the UK. Attendances in 2021 reached the highest levels on record for their respective months [1].
• Performance Decline: In September 2021, 4-hour performance in English Type 1 EDs fell to 64%, the lowest on record at the time. This meant one-third of all patients stayed longer than four hours [11]. The constitutional standard is 95% [3].
• Prolonged Stays: The number of patients waiting over 12 hours from their time of arrival has increased dramatically. In 2020-21, despite the pandemic-related drop in overall attendance, thousands of patients experienced these extreme waits [11]. No patient should stay in an ED for over 12 hours [1, 3].
• Ambulance Delays: Ambulance handover delays have worsened significantly, with the 95th percentile for handover in September 2021 reaching 104 minutes [11]. The national target is 15 minutes [4].

Vulnerable groups, including the elderly, children, and patients with dementia, mental health conditions, or learning difficulties, are disproportionately affected by the stressful and chaotic environment of a crowded ED [3]. Furthermore, deprivation is the single most important factor in determining ED demand; the most deprived communities use ED services significantly more than the least deprived [1].

Aetiology (Causes)

The root cause of ED crowding is a systemic mismatch between demand for urgent care and the capacity of the health and social care system to meet it [1].

Factor	Aetiological Contributors
Output Failure (Primary Driver)	Insufficient Staffed Bed Capacity: Since 2010, over 29,000 hospital beds have been removed from the system. The UK has one of the lowest numbers of beds per capita among OECD nations (2.4 per 1,000 inhabitants in 2020) [1, 11]. <br> High Hospital Occupancy: Recommended bed occupancy is below 85% to ensure flow; however, NHS England hospitals consistently operated above this level pre-pandemic and are returning to it post-pandemic [3, 11]. <br> Delayed Discharges: A lack of funded social care and community services prevents medically fit patients from being discharged, occupying beds needed for emergency admissions [1, 3].
Throughput Failure	Workforce Crisis: There is a shortfall of 2,000-2,500 Whole Time Equivalent (WTE) Emergency Medicine consultants in the UK. Shortages of ED nurses, Allied Health Professionals (AHPs), and Staff and Associate Specialist (SAS) doctors are also severe [1]. <br> Process Inefficiency: Delays in accessing diagnostics (radiology, labs), receiving specialist reviews, and duplication of processes between the ED and admitting teams impede patient flow [3, 12]. <br> Physical Environment: Many EDs are too small, run-down, and not designed to manage current patient volumes. A third of EDs are too small for their current workloads [1].
Input Pressure	Increased Demand: Rising and more complex patient presentations contribute to overall system pressure [1, 8]. <br> Lack of Primary Care Access: Many patients attend the ED after failing to get timely care elsewhere. Areas of high deprivation often have poor provision of primary and preventative care, driving ED use [1, 8].

The "Vicious Circle" of Crowding

Crowding is a self-perpetuating phenomenon. Exit block prevents new patients from being seen, prolonging their time to treatment. These delays can lead to clinical deterioration, increasing the likelihood of admission and the length of subsequent hospital stay. This, in turn, reduces bed availability and fuels further exit block, creating a "vicious circle" of system failure and patient harm [3].

This dynamic can be understood through the lens of Self-Organised Criticality. Like a sand pile where adding one more grain can trigger a massive avalanche, an ED operating near its capacity threshold is in a critical state. In this state, a small increase in patient numbers can cause a disproportionate and unpredictable collapse in performance, leading to catastrophic crowding events far more frequently than linear models would predict [13].

Risk Stratification and Prognosis

The most critical consequence of ED crowding is an increased risk of patient death. The language used in escalation must reflect that this is not a theoretical risk but a statistically certain harm affecting the patient population.

Prognosis and Mortality Evidence

Multiple studies have established a direct causal link between ED length of stay and mortality.

• The GIRFT Emergency Medicine Report identified an increase in the Standardised Mortality Ratio (SMR) for patients with ED delays beyond 5-6 hours from arrival. Their logistic regression model found an associated 30-day mortality rate for 1 in every 67 patients delayed by 8-12 hours [1].
• Jones et al. (2022) found a linear increase in all-cause 30-day mortality for admitted patients with ED stays between 5 and 12 hours. The analysis equates to one extra death for every 82 patients whose admission is delayed by 6 to 8 hours (Number Needed to Harm = 82) [5, 14].
• The RCEMLearning blog "Combatting the Crowd" summarises this as "For every 72 patients waiting in your department for longer than eight hours, one will die" [15].

These figures, while slightly different, point to the same grim conclusion: delays are lethal. Applying this data, the RCEM estimated that in 2020-21, over 4,519 excess deaths occurred in England due to crowding, a figure that unfavorably compares to the 1,827 deaths from road traffic collisions in 2019 [11].

Key Metrics for Measuring Crowding

Objective measurement is essential for demonstrating the severity of crowding and for effective escalation. Key metrics include [3, 12]:

• Ambulance offload time: Delays beyond the 15-minute target.
• Time to initial assessment and treatment.
• ED occupancy: The number of patients in treatment spaces versus the designated capacity.
• Waiting room occupancy and acuity.
• ED length of stay (LOS): Particularly for admitted patients.
• Number of boarded patients: Admitted patients awaiting an inpatient bed.
• Admitted Patient Delay (APD): A GIRFT metric measuring exit block [5].

Complications of Crowding and Treatments

Crowding creates a cascade of harms that affect patients, staff, and the entire healthcare system.

Category	Immediate Complications	Delayed Complications
Patient: Clinical	- Delayed analgesia for severe pain [16]. <br> - Delayed antibiotics for sepsis [16]. <br> - Increased risk of medication errors [14]. <br> - Care in inappropriate, undignified spaces (corridors, ambulances) [3]. <br> - Suboptimal monitoring and failure to recognise deterioration [14]. <br> - Increased risk of falls and pressure sores [10].	- Increased 30-day all-cause mortality [5, 11]. <br> - Increased overall hospital length of stay [11]. <br> - Higher risk of readmission [3]. <br> - Deconditioning due to immobility [10]. <br> - Nosocomial infections from exposure in crowded spaces [4].
Patient: Experience	- Loss of autonomy and helplessness [17]. <br> - Unmet expectations (lack of information, food, water, toileting facilities) [17]. <br> - Feelings of vulnerability, fear, and being depersonalised [17]. <br> - Loss of privacy and dignity [14].	- Reluctance to seek future emergency care, even when necessary [17]. <br> - Increased likelihood of formal complaints [3, 11].
Staff	- Inability to provide safe, high-quality care [11]. <br> - Increased exposure to violence, aggression, and inter-specialty conflict [3]. <br> - Physical and cognitive overload [3, 12].	- Moral injury and distress: Psychological harm from being unable to take ethically correct actions [11]. <br> - Burnout: Emotional exhaustion and depersonalisation, with levels consistently higher in EM than other specialties [11]. <br> - Attrition: Staff leaving the profession, retiring early, or reducing hours, worsening the workforce crisis [1, 11].
System	- Ambulance ramping, preventing crews from responding to community emergencies [4, 11]. <br> - Breakdown of departmental processes and efficiency [3].	- Increased litigation: Emergency Medicine accounts for 12% of all NHS litigation liabilities, with an average liability per ED attendance of £19.39 [1]. <br> - Cancellation of elective surgery due to lack of beds, hampering elective recovery [11]. <br> - Increased costs from locum/agency staff and legal action [3]. <br> - Reputational damage to the hospital and the NHS [3].

Management: Practical Strategies and Escalation

The management of a crowded ED requires a dual approach: implementing whole-system solutions to address the root cause (exit block) and employing in-department tactics to mitigate immediate harm. The shift leader's role is to act as a "system operator," making strategic decisions about flow and escalating clearly and professionally to compel a hospital-wide response [12].

A. Whole-System Interventions (Output-Focused)

These are the most effective long-term solutions and require engagement from the entire hospital leadership.

1. Full Capacity Protocol (FCP) / "Reverse Corridor"
   • Concept: Instead of concentrating all risk in the ED, the FCP distributes it across the hospital. It is a triggered escalation process where admitted patients are sent to their destination ward before a physical bed is available. They may be temporarily held in a ward corridor, treatment room, or discharge lounge [3, 14, 18].
   • Rationale: This is a "least-worst" option. The principle is that a stable, assessed patient boarding in a ward environment presents a lower overall risk than an accumulation of unassessed, undifferentiated patients in ambulances or ED corridors [3]. It makes the problem of exit block visible to the entire hospital.
   • RCEM Position: Cautiously supports the practice as part of a suite of measures to tackle crowding, recognising it is a response to, not a solution for, the problem [3].
2. Continuous Flow Models (CFM)
   • Concept: A proactive approach that moves from reactive escalation to a hard-wired system of predictable patient flow. Based on data of average daily admissions, a set number of patients are "pulled" from the ED to inpatient assessment units at regular intervals (e.g., one patient per hour) [3, 19].
   • Example (North Bristol Model): One patient is transferred from the ED to the Acute Medical Unit every hour, and one every two hours to the Acute Frailty Unit. This smooths the flow of admissions across the 24-hour period, preventing dangerous peaks [3].
   • Benefit: Allows the ED to maintain an empty cubicle for the next ambulance arrival, dramatically improving handover times and safety [3].
3. Enhanced Same Day Emergency Care (SDEC) / Ambulatory Emergency Care (AEC)
   • Strategy: Rapid expansion of SDEC and AEC services to be available 12 hours a day, seven days a week, with the same access to diagnostics as the ED. These services are cost-effective and reduce avoidable admissions [1, 11].

B. In-Department Strategies (Throughput-Focused)

These are tactical measures to improve flow and mitigate harm within the ED during periods of crowding.

1. Senior Clinical Leadership
   • Emergency Physician in Charge (EPIC): A designated senior clinician responsible for overseeing the entire department, maintaining situational awareness, and coordinating the operational response. They should not be expected to carry an individual caseload [3, 12].
   • Consultant-Led "Front-Loading" / Rapid Assessment and Treatment (RAT): A senior decision-maker performs an initial, time-limited assessment of new arrivals to identify "quick wins," initiate definitive investigations early, and stream patients appropriately. This reduces delays and overall LOS [14, 15].
2. Structured Safety Huddles
   • A non-negotiable process at the start of each shift to establish a shared mental model. The huddle must be multidisciplinary and follow a structured script [12]:
     • Looking Back: Review issues from the previous shift.
     • Looking Forward: Proactively identify current risks (capacity, acuity, staffing).
     • Finalise: Assign accountability for actions and set clear shift goals.
3. Tactics to Create Capacity
   • "Fit to Sit": Aggressively identify patients who do not require a trolley and can be safely managed in a chair, freeing up cubicles for sicker patients [18, 20].
   • Reverse Triage: Actively move stable patients out of high-acuity areas (Resus, Majors) to lower-acuity spaces (ambulatory areas, waiting room chairs) to create capacity for new critical arrivals [6].
   • Prioritise Pulls to Wards: When a specialty bed becomes available, prioritise seeing patients with clear admissions for that destination to facilitate a quick move [20].

C. The Escalation Toolkit: Scripts & Phrases

Effective escalation requires shifting the narrative from subjective appeals ("we're busy") to objective, evidence-based statements of clinical harm and corporate risk.

Scenario	Weak Language (to avoid)	Strong, Safety-Centred Escalation Phrase	Why it Works
Escalating to Site/Hospital Management	"We are really busy and stressed. We need beds."	"I am escalating this because the department is currently clinically unsafe. We have [Number] patients waiting over 12 hours, which is a known determinant of increased 30-day mortality and is now a corporate safety risk. The ED cannot safely absorb any more risk. I require you to enact the Full Capacity Protocol now." [6, 14]	Cites evidence, frames the issue as a hospital-wide safety failure, links it to corporate risk, and requests a specific, pre-agreed action.
Escalating to a Specialty Team	"Can you just come and see them now?"	"This patient has a time-critical condition. Due to overcrowding, I cannot guarantee their safety while they wait in the corridor. I am formally handing over clinical risk to your specialty now. If you cannot attend within 30 minutes, I require you to come and personally document the decision and assume clinical responsibility for the wait." [6, 14]	Centers the conversation on patient harm, transfers professional accountability, and forces the receiving team to co-own the risk of delay.
Ambulance Handover Delays	"The crews are stuck outside."	"We have zero physical capacity to offload and are operating at OPEL 4. This is a system critical incident. The delay is preventing ambulance response to patients with suspected cardiac arrests in the community. I require immediate activation of the escalation plan to create space." [6, 14]	Links the ED issue to wider public harm, uses official incident language (OPEL 4), and creates urgency for a system response.

D. Documentation for Safety

When forced to provide care in a compromised environment, documentation is a professional and medico-legal necessity. It creates an audit trail and highlights systemic failures.

The "Crowding Note" Template:

"Patient seen and assessed in [e.g., Corridor / Ambulance Bay / Non-clinical area] due to severe departmental overcrowding (Department at OPEL 4 status). A full and private examination was not possible, and the patient's dignity could not be fully maintained. Clinical monitoring was limited by the environment. The significant clinical risk this situation poses to this patient and others has been escalated to the Duty Consultant, Site Manager, and [Specialty] team at [Time]." [14]

Learning Aids and Practical Tools

Mnemonic: The "CARES" Bedside Check

When managing a department under pressure, use this framework derived from the RCEM's strategic pillars to guide your situational awareness [6]:

• Crowding: Are we unsafe? Do I need to escalate NOW?
• Access: Is flow blocked? Who owns the delay?
• Retention: Are my staff Hungry, Angry, Late, or Tired (HALT)? Have they had a break?
• Experience: Are patients and relatives informed of delays?
• Safety: Is the waiting room visually triaged? Who are the sickest patients?

Mnemonic: Time-Critical Medications ("MISSED")

In a crowded ED, medication errors are common. Prioritise patients on these time-critical medications to avoid harm [3]:

• Movement Disorders: Parkinson’s, myasthenia gravis medications.
• Immunomodulators: Including HIV medications.
• Sugar: Diabetes medications (insulin, etc.).
• Steroids: For Addison’s, adrenal insufficiency.
• Epilepsy medications.
• DOACs and warfarin.

RCEM CARES Shift Leader Checklist

This tool condenses key safety actions for the shift leader [6].

Operations & Flow (The "Hard" Skills)	People & Culture (The "Soft" Skills)
1. START OF SHIFT (The Setup) <br> ☐ Sitrep: Total in dept? Resus capacity? Wait times? <br> ☐ Staffing: Review skill mix. Identify gaps. <br> ☐ Safety: Who are the sickest 3 patients? <br> ☐ Huddle: Set a calm tone. Assign breaks.	1. RETENTION (Staff Care) <br> ☐ HALT Check: Is the team Hungry, Angry, Late, or Tired? <br> ☐ Hydration: Have I and the triage nurse had a drink? <br> ☐ Civility: Correct rudeness immediately but privately.
2. HOURLY SCAN (Crowding & Access) <br> ☐ Input vs. Output: Are ambulances offloading? Is Exit Block worsening? <br> ☐ Trigger: If offload delay >15m → ESCALATE. <br> ☐ Reverse Triage: Move stable patients out of Resus/Majors. <br> ☐ Waiting Room: Visual safety check.	2. EXPERIENCE (Conflict & Comms) <br> ☐ Conflict (DESC): Describe behaviour → Express concern → Specify change → Consequences. <br> ☐ Relatives: Update them early. "We are crowded, but we are safe." <br> ☐ Debrief: After any critical event.
3. END OF SHIFT (The Handover) <br> ☐ "Clean" Handover: Use SBAR. Handover plans, not problems. <br> ☐ Thank You: Give specific praise to team members. <br> ☐ Datix: Log any system failure. (No Datix = It didn't happen).

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

References

1. Royal College of Emergency Medicine. RCEM CARES: The next phase. London: RCEM; 2021.
2. International Federation for Emergency Medicine. Report from the Emergency Department Crowding and Access Block Task Force. IFEM; 2020 June.
3. Royal College of Emergency Medicine. The Management of Emergency Department Crowding. London: RCEM; 2024 Jan.
4. Royal College of Emergency Medicine, College of Paramedics. Ambulance Handover Delays: Options Appraisal to Support Good Decision Making. 2021 Mar.
5. Moulton C, Mann C. Emergency Medicine. GIRFT National Programme Speciality Report. 2021.
6. Mastering RCEM SLO 12: Manage, Administer, Lead [Source Document].
7. Royal College of Emergency Medicine. Clinical Responsibility for Patients within the Emergency Department. 2023 Aug.
8. Asplin BR, Magid DJ, Rhodes KV, et al. A conceptual model of emergency department crowding. Ann Emerg Med. 2003;42(2):173-180.
9. Kirkland SW, Soleimani A, Rowe BH, Newton AS. A systematic review examining the impact of redirecting low-acuity patients seeking emergency department care: is the juice worth the squeeze? Emerg Med J. 2019 Feb;36(2):97-106.
10. Bruijns S. Speaking urgent care flow fluently. St.Emlyn's [Internet]. 2023 Nov 15.
11. Royal College of Emergency Medicine. RCEM Acute Insight Series: Crowding and its Consequences. London: RCEM; 2021 Nov.
12. Mastery of Command: A Practical Guide to Achieving RCEM SLO 8 – Lead the ED Shift [Source Document].
13. Bruijns S. Self-Organised Criticality: Why your ED is like a Sand Pile. St.Emlyn's [Internet]. 2025 May 24.
14. This comprehensive practical document is written for UK NHS Emergency Medicine doctors [Source Document].
15. Fielding P. Combatting the Crowd. RCEMLearning [Internet]. 2021 Nov 9.
16. Pines JM, Hollander JE. Emergency department crowding is associated with poor care for patients with severe pain. Ann Emerg Med. 2008 Jan;51(1):1-5.
17. Crowe L. Patient experience in the Emergency Department. St.Emlyn's [Internet]. 2024 Sep 3.
18. Escalation ideas & Actions [Source Document].
19. Vaughan LK, Bruijns S. Continuous flow models in urgent and emergency care. BMJ. 2022;379:o2751.
20. Bruijns S, Boulind C. JC: Improving patient flow. St.Emlyn's [Internet]. 2020 Mar 22.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Appendix: Example Electronic Health Record (EHR) Documentation Structure

This structure is designed for use in an EPIC EHR system to provide robust documentation during periods of severe crowding, focusing on safety actions and medico-legal clarity.

ED Crowding Safety Note

1. Departmental Status (Tick Box)

• [ ] Department at OPEL 4 / Critical Incident Declared at [Time]
• [ ] Full Capacity Protocol (FCP) Activated at [Time]
• [ ] Ambulance Diversion in place
• [ ] Ambulance handover delay > 30 minutes
• [ ] Number of patients in department: [Enter Number] (Designated capacity: [Enter Number])
• [ ] Number of admitted patients boarding in ED: [Enter Number]
• [ ] Longest patient wait in ED: [Enter Hours]

2. Patient Assessment Context (Tick Box)

• [ ] Patient assessed in non-clinical area: [e.g., Corridor, Waiting Room Chair, Ambulance]
• [ ] Full privacy and dignity could not be maintained
• [ ] Examination limited by environment
• [ ] Continuous monitoring not available/sub-optimal

3. Escalation and Risk Mitigation Actions (Tick Box)

• [ ] Escalated to ED Consultant / EPIC at [Time]
• [ ] Escalated to Site Management regarding clinical risk and capacity at [Time]
• [ ] Escalated to [Specialty] team regarding delay in review/admission at [Time]
• [ ] Clinical risk formally handed over to [Specialty] team at [Time]
• [ ] Repeat vital signs and safety check performed at [Time]
• [ ] Patient/Family informed of delays due to systemic pressures
• [ ] Time-critical medications ("MISSED" doses) checked and administered

4. Medical Decision Making / Summary

Situation: This patient was assessed during a period of severe departmental overcrowding (OPEL 4), with the department operating significantly beyond its designated capacity. The primary driver is hospital-wide exit block, with [Number] admitted patients boarding in the ED.

Assessment: The patient was located in [e.g., the main corridor], which limited the ability to perform a comprehensive and private examination. The environment poses a significant clinical risk due to suboptimal monitoring, potential for delayed recognition of deterioration, and an increased risk of errors.

Plan & Rationale: All immediate life threats have been addressed based on the available assessment. The plan is [Insert clinical plan]. The significant risks posed by the crowded environment have been explicitly communicated to the Site Management team and the admitting [Specialty] team. The responsibility for ongoing safety and the harm caused by delays in admission has been escalated accordingly. Will continue to perform regular safety checks while the patient remains in the department.

=================================

MEM-EM PODCAST

1.14 Crowding Kills - Find Your Tipping Point!

                                                                         Apple podcast

Spotify Podcast

Amazon Music 

  You Tube Music Podcasts

  

ACCS learning outcome: Manage patients with organ dysfunction and failure

 

ACCS learning outcome: Manage patients with organ dysfunction and failure

Managing Organ Dysfunction and Failure: A Guide for ACCS Trainees

Executive Summary

The effective management of organ dysfunction and failure is a cornerstone of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine. This briefing document outlines the essential knowledge and procedural steps for ACCS trainees to achieve competence and excel in this critical domain, corresponding to RCEM curriculum code ACCS LO 3 / SLO 1.

Key takeaways include the imperative to recognize impending organ failure before physiological decompensation by looking beyond vital signs and utilizing tools like NEWS2 and lactate trends. A structured, critical-care-focused Airway, Breathing, Circulation, Disability, Exposure (A-E) assessment is paramount. This involves anticipating the need for advanced airway management, differentiating respiratory failure types, defining shock states with the aid of Point of Care Ultrasound (POCUS), and initiating neuroprotective measures.

Initial management focuses on timely organ support. Cardiovascular support requires judicious fluid challenges with balanced crystalloids, followed by the early initiation of peripheral vasopressors to maintain a Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) > 65mmHg. Respiratory support involves escalating from standard oxygen to High-Flow Nasal Oxygen (HFNO) or Non-Invasive Ventilation (NIV) where appropriate, with a low threshold for recognizing treatment failure. Renal protection is achieved through strict fluid balance, maintaining perfusion, and ceasing nephrotoxic medications.

Excellence in this area transcends basic management; it involves advanced physiological reasoning, such as understanding fluid responsiveness versus tolerance and calculating the Shock Index. Furthermore, superior performance is demonstrated through strong team leadership, employing closed-loop communication, developing a shared mental model, and making timely, appropriate decisions regarding escalation to Critical Care or establishing a ceiling of care.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Introduction

The ability to recognize, stabilize, and manage patients presenting with organ dysfunction is a fundamental requirement for trainees in Acute Care Common Stem (ACCS) and Emergency Medicine. This learning outcome demands more than a routine assessment; it requires a deep understanding of pathophysiology, the skills to initiate organ support, and the nuanced decision-making involved in escalating care to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). This guide provides a structured approach to developing these capabilities, from initial assessment to advanced management strategies and portfolio development.

Recognition and Systematic Clinical Assessment

The first and most critical step in managing organ failure is its early recognition, often before the patient exhibits overt signs of decompensation.

Identifying the 'At-Risk' Patient

Physiological compensation can effectively mask profound underlying organ dysfunction, leading to a sudden and catastrophic decline known as the "physiological cliff." Therefore, assessment must go beyond simple vital signs.

• Early Warning Scores: The National Early Warning Score (NEWS2) should be used to track physiological trends over time. It serves as a crucial trigger for review, not as a standalone diagnostic tool (1).
• Biochemical Markers: Serum lactate is a key surrogate marker for tissue hypoperfusion. A rising lactate level, particularly in a patient undergoing resuscitation, is a significant indicator of ongoing microvascular failure and inadequate resuscitation.

The Structured A-E Assessment: A Critical Care Focus

The standard A-E assessment must be adapted with a critical care mindset to identify and pre-empt organ failure.

• Airway: Assess for patency, protection, and the potential for future deterioration.
  • Excellence Point: Anticipate the need for Rapid Sequence Induction (RSI) early. If a patient shows signs of tiring, has a dropping Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), or is failing to protect their airway, an immediate call to Anaesthetics/ICU is warranted.
• Breathing: Differentiate between Type 1 (Hypoxic) and Type 2 (Hypercapnic) respiratory failure to guide therapy.
  • Intervention: Promptly escalate respiratory support from a non-rebreather mask to High Flow Nasal Oxygen (HFNO) or Non-Invasive Ventilation (NIV) when indicated (2).
• Circulation: The primary goal is to define the shock state. Classify the shock as Distributive, Cardiogenic, Hypovolaemic, or Obstructive to direct treatment.
  • Excellence Point: Utilize Point of Care Ultrasound (POCUS) to dynamically assess fluid status (e.g., IVC diameter and collapsibility) and cardiac contractility. This prevents the harm associated with administering large fluid volumes to a patient with a failing heart (3).
• Disability: Perform a rapid neurological assessment, including checking blood glucose and pupillary response.
  • Intervention: In patients with brain injuries, institute neuroprotective measures by maintaining normoglycaemia and avoiding pyrexia.
• Exposure: Conduct a full top-to-toe examination to identify potential sources of sepsis (e.g., skin infections, lines), rashes suggestive of specific pathologies, or evidence of trauma.

Step-by-Step Management and Organ Support

Demonstrating competence requires the ability to safely and effectively initiate organ support in the Emergency Department.

Step 1: Cardiovascular Support

While fluid resuscitation is the initial step, it must be administered cautiously to avoid the significant harm associated with fluid overload.

1. Fluid Challenge: Administer a bolus of 250-500ml of a balanced crystalloid solution (e.g., Plasmalyte, Hartmann’s). Systematically assess the patient's response by monitoring blood pressure, heart rate, capillary refill time, and urine output.
2. Vasopressor Initiation: If hypotension persists after initial fluid resuscitation, vasopressors should be started early to restore organ perfusion. The target is a Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) of >65mmHg (4).
   • Medication: Peripheral vasopressors such as Metaraminol or a dilute Noradrenaline infusion can be used.
   • Safety Precaution: Administration requires a patent, large-bore cannula in a large, proximal vein. The site must be checked frequently for any signs of extravasation.

Step 2: Respiratory Support

1. Oxygen Saturation Targets: Aim for SpO2 of 94-98% in most patients. For patients at risk of hypercapnic respiratory failure (e.g., COPD), the target should be 88-92%.
2. High Flow Nasal Oxygen (HFNO): This is an excellent intervention for Type 1 respiratory failure (e.g., pneumonia). HFNO delivers a high flow of humidified, heated oxygen, which provides a degree of Positive End-Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) and reduces anatomical dead space (2).
3. Non-Invasive Ventilation (NIV):
   • CPAP: Continuous Positive Airway Pressure is the first-line treatment for acute cardiogenic pulmonary oedema.
   • BiPAP: Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure is the first-line treatment for exacerbations of COPD with respiratory acidosis.
   • Excellence Point: Recognize NIV failure early. Signs of failure include patient agitation, significant air leak, or a failure of the pH to improve after one hour of therapy. If failure is recognized, plans for definitive airway management (intubation) must be made immediately.

Step 3: Renal Protection

Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) is a common complication of critical illness and is independently associated with increased mortality.

1. Monitoring: An indwelling urinary catheter is mandatory for strict fluid balance monitoring.
2. Perfusion: Maintain adequate renal perfusion pressure by ensuring the MAP remains >65mmHg.
3. Medication Review: Stop all nephrotoxic drugs, including ACE inhibitors, NSAIDs, and certain antibiotics like Gentamicin.
4. Managing Complications: Treat hyperkalaemia immediately. Administer intravenous Calcium Gluconate for cardiac membrane stabilization, followed by an Insulin/Dextrose infusion to shift potassium intracellularly.

Strategies for Excelling in Practice

Moving from competence to excellence involves a deeper understanding of physiology, team dynamics, and system-level management.

Advanced Physiological Reasoning

• Fluid Responsiveness vs. Fluid Tolerance: A key concept is that while a patient may be "fluid responsive" (i.e., their stroke volume increases with a fluid bolus), this does not automatically mean they require more fluid. Additional fluid should only be given if there is concurrent clinical evidence of hypoperfusion.
• Shock Index (SI): Calculate the SI by dividing the Heart Rate by the Systolic Blood Pressure (HR/SBP). An SI greater than 0.9 is a strong indicator of significant shock, even if the blood pressure appears deceptively normal (5).

Human Factors and Team Leadership

• Closed-Loop Communication: When leading a resuscitation, ensure all instructions are heard, understood, and actioned. The team member should repeat the instruction back, and the leader should receive confirmation once the task is complete.
• Shared Mental Model: Verbalize the clinical picture, the team's actions, and the treatment goals. For example: "This is a 65-year-old with septic shock. We have given 2L of fluid and are starting Metaraminol. The target MAP is 65." This ensures the entire team is aligned.

Appropriate Escalation and De-escalation

• Ceiling of Care: Initiate discussions about the appropriate level of intervention and potential "ceiling of care" early in the patient's journey, involving patients and relatives where possible. Excellence includes knowing when resuscitation is not appropriate.
• ICU Consultation: Consult the Intensive Care team early. Present the case clearly and concisely using a structured handover tool like SBAR (Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendation).
• Definitive Care: Do not delay the patient's transfer to definitive care, whether that is the cardiac catheterization lab, the operating theatre, or the ICU.

Achieving the Learning Outcome: Portfolio Evidence

To demonstrate achievement of this ACCS learning outcome, trainees must provide robust evidence within their ePortfolio.

Expected Capabilities and Descriptors

Trainees are expected to demonstrate the ability to:

• Recognise, assess, and initiate management for acutely ill adults with single or multiple organ failure.
• Recognise and manage sepsis, employing local infection control policies.
• Safely perform invasive procedures for cardiovascular, renal, and respiratory support.
• Utilise and interpret laboratory and imaging investigations.
• Manage ongoing medical needs and organ support, including holistic care for patients and relatives.
• Recognise the limitations of intensive care and apply appropriate admission criteria.
• Plan and communicate patient discharge from intensive care effectively.
• Support end-of-life care within the ICU environment.
• Understand the role of transplant services and the principles of brain-stem death testing.
• Support staff outside the ICU in the early detection of deteriorating patients.

Generating Portfolio Evidence

Evidence to inform entrustment decisions can be gathered through various workplace-based assessments and activities:

• Case-based Discussion (CbD): Discuss a complex case, such as septic shock or diabetic ketoacidosis, focusing on the rationale for fluid management strategies and choices of vasoactive drugs.
• Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise (Mini-CEX): Arrange for a consultant to directly observe the leadership of a resuscitation case or the practical skill of setting up and managing NIV.
• Reflection: Provide written reflections on challenging cases. Examples include a difficult communication with the ICU team or a case where a decision was made for palliative care.
• Other Evidence: Multi-Source Feedback (MSF) and the Multi-Consultant Report (MCR) will also contribute to the overall assessment.
• RCEMLearning Resources: Utilize modules, Single Best Answer (SBA) questions, and Short Answer Questions (SAQ) from the RCEMLearning platform relevant to this learning outcome. Certificates of completion are automatically added to the CPD Diary and provide excellent evidence of engagement.

References

1. Royal College of Physicians. National Early Warning Score (NEWS) 2: Standardising the assessment of acute-illness severity in the NHS. Updated report of a working party. London: RCP; 2017.
2. Rochwerg B, Einav S, Chaudhuri D, Mancebo J, Mauri T, Helviz Y, et al. The role for high flow nasal cannula as a respiratory support strategy in adults: a clinical practice guideline. Intensive Care Med. 2020;46(12):2226-2237.
3. Working Group on Ultrasound in Acute Care Medicine. International evidence-based recommendations for point-of-care lung ultrasound. Intensive Care Med. 2012;38(4):577-591.
4. Evans L, Rhodes A, Alhazzani W, Antonelli M, Coopersmith CM, French C, et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2021. Crit Care Med. 2021;49(11):e1063-e1143.
5. Allgöwer M, Burri C. Shock index. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1967;92(43):1947-1950.

-----------------------------------------------------------------

MEM-EM PODCAST

2.14 ACCS learning outcome: Manage patients with organ dysfunction and failure

                                                                         Apple podcast

Spotify Podcast

Amazon Music 

  You Tube Music Podcasts

  

 

Achieving Mastery in RCEM Specialty Learning Outcome 7

Executive Summary

Specialty Learning Outcome 7 (SLO 7), "Deal with complex and challenging situations in the workplace," is a continuous and mandatory component of Royal College of Emergency Medicine (RCEM) training, representing the pinnacle of professional competence for an Emergency Physician [1, 2]. Mastery of this outcome signifies a transition from a clinical proceduralist to an autonomous leader capable of managing the multifaceted challenges inherent to the Emergency Department (ED). This requires a demonstrable integration of clinical excellence with robust professionalism, advanced communication, ethical acumen, and systemic leadership [2, 3].

The core requirement for mastery, particularly at Higher Training levels (Entrustment Levels 3 and 4), is the ability to manage complex clinical, interpersonal, and systemic challenges with no supervisor involvement [4]. This autonomy must be evidenced through consistent, high-quality performance in four key domains:

1. Advanced Communication and Conflict Resolution: Expertly de-escalating patient aggression, navigating high-stakes professional disagreements, and structuring difficult conversations (e.g., breaking bad news, managing complaints) using established frameworks [4, 12].
2. Non-Technical Skills (NTS) and Crisis Management: Systematically applying NTS, including Arousal Management to control personal stress responses and team cognitive load. Utilizing practical mnemonics and frameworks like 5S (Self, Staff, Stuff, Space, Safety) for preparation and LIPS (Label, Important Points, Priorities, Strategy) for situation reports enhances team performance in crises [10, 11].
3. Ethical Acumen and Legal Governance: Applying structured ethical frameworks, such as the Four Principle Approach (Autonomy, Beneficence, Non-maleficence, Justice), to navigate bedside dilemmas involving consent, capacity, triage, and professional misconduct, all while operating within UK legal parameters [4, 7].
4. Systemic Leadership and Flow Management: Moving beyond individual patient care to manage departmental crowding and patient flow at a macro-level. This involves using data, implementing evidence-based process improvements, and demonstrating Macro-Situational Awareness to drive system-wide change [2, 8, 22].

Demonstrating mastery for the Annual Review of Competence Progression (ARCP) requires strategic evidence generation. High-quality reflections on critical incidents using models like "What? So What? Now What?", detailed Extended Supervised Learning Episodes (ESLEs) capturing autonomous leadership, and Multi-Source Feedback (MSF) from external colleagues are essential [4, 6, 26]. Engagement in structured debriefing, both hot (e.g., STOP5) and cold (e.g., TRiM), provides further evidence of a commitment to team resilience and institutional learning [31].

1. Understanding RCEM Specialty Learning Outcome 7

1.1 Definition and Strategic Significance

SLO 7 is an outcome-based requirement that describes the behaviours and performance expected of an Emergency Physician upon completion of training [3]. It addresses the unpredictability of the ED environment by focusing on non-clinical challenges, including:

• Safe management of aggressive, distressed, or vulnerable patients [2].
• Sensitive handling of ethical dilemmas and end-of-life discussions [2].
• Balancing clinical workload, risk, and patient flow during departmental crowding [2].
• Maintaining professionalism and composure in high-pressure scenarios [2].

This SLO is the primary domain for demonstrating several General Medical Council (GMC) Generic Professional Capabilities (GPCs), specifically professional values (Domain 1), leadership (Domain 5), patient safety and quality improvement (Domain 6), and safeguarding (Domain 7) [3, 4]. Mastery requires a fundamental shift from a purely clinical focus to that of a leader managing complex systems and mitigating professional risk [4, 5].

1.2 Progressive Entrustment: Defining Mastery

The RCEM curriculum outlines a clear progression of entrustment. While intermediate trainees are expected to manage difficult interactions with supervisor support available from home, Higher Training trainees (ST4–ST6) must demonstrate the autonomy characteristic of Entrustment Levels 3 and 4 [4, 6].

The defining marker of mastery is the ability to manage complex and challenging situations with no supervisor involvement [4]. This requires expert communication skills and independent ownership of clinical risk and conflict resolution [4, 7].

Table 1: Progression in Capability Descriptors for RCEM SLO 7 Mastery

Key Capability Domain	Intermediate Training (Entrustment Level 2/3)	Higher Training (Entrustment Level 4: Mastery)
Challenging Interactions	Able to work effectively with angry/distressed patients and negotiate troubling interactions, with consultant support available from home [4].	Possesses expert communication skills to negotiate and manage complicated or troubling interactions autonomously [4].
Professional Conduct	Behaves professionally with colleagues and external teams, recognizing the effect of stress and fatigue [4].	Sustains professional behavior consistently, working professionally and effectively with internal and external bodies without supervisor intervention [4].
System Management	Understands departmental stress points and supports colleagues in challenging circumstances [4].	Balances clinical workload, risk, and patient flow during extreme crowding using complex managerial interventions [2, 8].
ARCP Requirement	Entrustment Level 3 (Managing with support from home) [6].	Entrustment Level 4 (Managing any complex situation without supervision) [4, 6].

2. Core Competencies for Mastery

2.1 Non-Technical Skills (NTS) and Crisis Resource Management

Mastery of SLO 7 depends on the systematic development of advanced NTS, which include supervision, teamwork, decision-making, and situation awareness [9].

2.1.1 Arousal Management and Self-Care

Arousal Management involves regulating one's own stress and fear response, as well as managing these responses in others [11]. The inability to manage personal stress manifests as novice behaviours like "freezing," tremor, or negative self-talk, which can escalate patient distress or team conflict [11]. Mastery involves internalizing self-regulation techniques such as breathing exercises, mental rehearsal, and positive self-talk [11]. The I'M SAFE mnemonic is a tool for ensuring personal preparedness for work-related stressors.

2.1.2 Team Preparation and Situational Awareness

Effective team leadership begins before the patient arrives. The resuscitation effort starts with the pre-alert, and this time should be used for preparation.

• Preparation Framework (5S): A preferred approach is the Self / Staff / Stuff / Space / Safety model. This ensures personal readiness, correct team composition and skills, availability of equipment and drugs, appropriate environmental setup, and safety considerations (e.g., security) are all addressed proactively.
• Situation Report (Sit Rep): Once the team is assembled, a Sit Rep is vital for establishing a shared mental model. The LIPS mnemonic provides a structure:
  • Label the situation (e.g., "Critically ill hemorrhagic shock").
  • Important Points/findings emphasised (e.g., "No IV access").
  • Priorities (e.g., "IO access, transfuse blood, transfer to OT").
  • Strategy (Assign roles with names, use closed-loop communication, and specify timeframes). A "10 every 10" update (a 10-second update every 10 minutes) can help maintain this shared model.

The STEP UPS mnemonic provides a comprehensive framework for managing an entire ED shift and can be used for analysis in debriefs or exams. It covers: Self, Team, Environment, Patient, Updates, Priorities, and System.

2.2 Advanced Communication and Conflict Resolution

2.2.1 Managing Aggressive and Distressed Patients

A core mandate of SLO 7 is the safe management of aggression [2]. This begins with proactive risk assessment using ED-specific tools like STAMP or the Assessment, Behavioral indicators, and Conversation (ABC) framework [12]. The goal is to identify warning signs and use calm, thoughtful communication to de-escalate the situation before violence occurs [12, 13].

However, clinicians must also recognise definitive danger signs that indicate a physical attack is imminent. At this point, the priority shifts to personal safety, requiring withdrawal or preparation for physical intervention [13]. If PMVA (Prevention & Management of Violence & Aggression) protocols are initiated, staff have an ethical duty to continue employing de-escalation techniques throughout the physical intervention to minimise harm, thereby upholding the principle of Non-maleficence [7, 12].

2.2.2 Navigating Professional Conflict

Inter-professional conflict often stems from systemic pressures like heavy workloads, stress, and organisational problems, rather than just personality clashes [14]. A physician demonstrating mastery reframes these conflicts as opportunities for Quality Improvement (QI) projects, addressing the root cause (e.g., flawed communication pathways) and linking SLO 7 to patient safety improvements (GMC Domain 6) [4, 17].

A mindfulness exercise for managing in-the-moment conflict is the WTF to WTF method, which helps control feelings and work through disagreements.

2.2.3 Frameworks for Difficult Conversations

Structured approaches are essential for managing difficult conversations confidently and effectively.

• Breaking Bad News (SPIKES QID): An adaptation of the SPIKES model.
  • Setting & Set stage
  • Perception (Gather before you give)
  • Information (Ask if they want more details)
  • Knowledge (Chunk and check)
  • Empathy & Emotions (Use the NURSE acronym)
  • Summary & Strategy
  • QID: Questions? Information? Documentation?
• Demonstrating Empathy (NURSE):
  • Name the emotion.
  • Understand the driver behind the emotion.
  • Respect, praise, and appreciate.
  • Supportive statements.
  • Explore the story.
• Informed Consent (CONSENTS QID):
  • Condition, Options, Name of procedure, Side effects, Extra procedures, Named person, Training/trial, Summary.
  • QID: Questions? Information? Documentation?
• Managing Complaints (Doc ANSR): The core principles are senior staff involvement, documentation, and open disclosure. The process involves: 1. Ensure patient safety; 2. Apologise (an expression of empathy, not an admission of fault); 3. Notify relevant parties; 4. Search/Investigate; 5. Respond both externally and internally (e.g., via QI).

2.3 Ethical Acumen and Legal Frameworks

Ethical decision-making is a core skill-based competency in Emergency Medicine [7]. The objective is to move from emotional reactions to structured, rational, and defensible arguments [7].

2.3.1 Bedside Ethical Framework

The Four Principle Approach is a simple, robust, and flexible model for bedside ethical analysis [7, 19].

Table 2: The Four Principle Approach in the ED

Ethical Principle	Working Definition (Obligation)	SLO 7 Clinical Application in the ED
Autonomy	Respect the decision-making capacities of persons [7].	Managing refusal of life-saving treatment; executing complex capacity assessments; respecting patient wishes despite clinical disagreement [19].
Beneficence	Provide benefits and balance benefits against risks [7].	Ensuring timely, life-saving care; actively intervening to promote optimal outcomes.
Non-maleficence	Avoid causing harm ('primum non nocere') [7].	Avoiding unwarranted investigations or futile care; ensuring minimal harm during restraint protocols [7, 12].
Justice	Fairness in the distribution of benefits and risks [7].	Ethical triage during crowding; balancing needs of the worst-off against the greatest number; resolving family disputes over treatment [18, 20].

2.3.2 High-Stakes Dilemmas

Mastery requires navigating complex scenarios such as:

• Triage and Crowding: Functionally rationing scarce resources (staff, beds, diagnostics) based on principles of utilitarianism (greatest good for the greatest number) or social justice (prioritising the worst off) [7, 18].
• Consent and Capacity: Applying legal frameworks like the Mental Capacity Act to complex situations, including end-of-life discussions [1, 2].
• Professional Misconduct: Prioritizing patient safety over collegial loyalty when suspecting a colleague is impaired or has acted unethically, and following GMC guidelines for escalation [4, 7, 20].

Clinicians must be aware of specific legislation, including the Mental Health Act, Mental Capacity Act, Children's Act, Data Protection Act, and principles from the Caldicott Report.

2.4 Systemic Leadership and ED Flow Management

SLO 7 elevates the physician's role to macro-level systems management [2]. This involves leveraging data analytics (e.g., flow|ER software), implementing evidence-based process improvements (e.g., doctor triage, rapid assessment, POCT), and applying management science (e.g., Lean, Six Sigma) to reduce variability and improve flow [8, 22, 23].

Mastery requires working effectively with bodies outside the ED [4]. This is demonstrated by possessing Macro-Situational Awareness—the ability to monitor the entire hospital's capacity and anticipate system-wide failure points—and applying Adaptive Expertise to lead system-level changes, such as championing alternatives to admission like SDEC pathways and virtual wards [11, 22, 24].

3. Evidencing Mastery for ARCP

The RCEM curriculum is outcome-based, requiring trainees to provide sufficient evidence in their ePortfolio to support entrustment decisions [3].

3.1 Strategic Evidence Generation

For Higher Training, mandatory annual evidence includes an Educational Supervisor Report (ESR), one Multi-Source Feedback (MSF), and a minimum of three Extended Supervised Learning Episodes (ESLEs) [6]. All documentation must be explicitly tagged to SLO 7 [3, 4].

• ESLEs are ideal for capturing complex leadership, such as managing a chaotic shift, mediating a transfer disagreement, or leading a high-stakes ethical discussion [25].
• MSF must include feedback from a satisfactory range of external colleagues (e.g., Ward Sisters, Mental Health Liaison staff) to evidence the capability of working effectively with those outside the ED [4, 6].

Table 3: Evidence Requirements for SLO 7 Mastery at Higher Training

Evidence Type	Minimum Requirement (Annual)	SLO 7 Focus
Educational Supervisor Report (ESR)	One per training year [6].	Confirmation of Entrustment Level 3 or 4; commentary on ethical judgment, risk management, and system leadership.
Extended Supervised Learning Episodes (ESLEs)	Minimum three per year [6].	Documentation of managing complex ethical cases, severe conflict scenarios, system management during crowding, or demonstrating Adaptive Expertise [4].
Multi-Source Feedback (MSF)	Minimum one per year [6].	Demonstrating professional behavior and effective teamwork with diverse internal and external colleagues [4].
High-Quality Reflection	Multiple critical reflections tagged to SLO 7 [4].	Detailed critical analysis of incidents leading to documented behavioral or attitude change [21, 26].
Simulated Practice/Training	Documented evidence of participation [4].	Assessment of NTS performance (e.g., arousal management) in simulated challenging encounters [11].

3.2 The Role of Critical Reflection

High-quality reflection is a prerequisite for professional competence [5, 27]. The "What? So What? Now What?" model is a powerful tool for moving beyond simple description to deep analysis [26].

1. What? Describe the incident, your role, and your initial reactions.
2. So What? Analyze the event, connecting theory (ethical frameworks, NTS concepts) to your actions to identify core problems.
3. Now What? Articulate what was learned and how it will change future behavior.

True mastery requires reaching the level of Critical Reflection, which involves questioning one's own deeply-held assumptions, beliefs, and knowledge [5, 26].

3.3 Structured Debriefing and Simulation

Simulation provides a safe environment to practice NTS and manage challenging scenarios [4, 30]. The learning from simulation and real-world critical incidents is maximized through structured debriefing.

• Hot Debriefing: Conducted immediately after an event to diffuse emotion, review facts, and identify learning points. Departmental tools like TAKE STOCK provide a structure for this process and can trigger QI initiatives [29, 31].
• Debriefing with Good Judgment: This advanced technique uses an advocacy-inquiry method to explore the cognitive frames—the Knowledge, Assumptions, and Feelings (NAFs)—that drove a person's actions. This fosters a shared understanding of decision-making processes and avoids a "shame-and-blame" culture.
• Cold Debriefing and TRiM: For incidents with significant emotional or traumatic impact, a "cold" debrief may be required later. TRiM (Trauma Risk Management) is a peer-support system designed to aid staff recovery after such events.

4. Conclusion and Ongoing Professional Development

Mastery of RCEM SLO 7 is the hallmark of a mature Emergency Physician, signifying the successful integration of professionalism, ethical judgment, leadership, and crisis management [4]. It confirms the physician's capacity for autonomous practice in the most demanding circumstances. This is achieved not just through clinical knowledge, but through demonstrable behavioural change rooted in critical reflection and highly developed non-technical skills [5, 11].

This competence must be sustained beyond the Certificate of Completion of Training (CCT) through a commitment to lifelong learning. Continued engagement with advanced leadership training, such as the RCEM leadership programme or the Emergency Department Directors Academy (EDDA), is vital for developing the macro-system capabilities needed to influence institutional culture and improve patient flow [4, 32]. The ultimate application of SLO 7 mastery is mentorship: modeling professional conduct, promoting psychological safety, and fostering a departmental culture that values critical reflection and structured debriefing to build a resilient and ethically sound team [17].

References

1. Specialty Learning Outcomes (SLOs) [Internet]. RCEMCurriculum. [cited 2024 May 20]. Available from: https://rcemcurriculum.co.uk/specialty-learning-outcomes-slos/
2. RCEM SLOs Explained: The Key to Mastering Emergency Medicine [Internet]. EM Learning Centre. [cited 2024 May 20]. Available from: https://www.emlearningcentre.com/blog/rcem-slos-explained-the-key-to-mastering-emergency-medicine
3. RCEM Curriculum - Further guidance on Generic SLO [Internet]. AWSEM. [cited 2024 May 20]. Available from: https://awsem.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Appendix-3-Generic-SLO-Curriculum-Supporting-Material.pdf
4. SLO 7 - Deal with complex or challenging situations in the workplace [Internet]. RCEMCurriculum. [cited 2024 May 20]. Available from: https://rcemcurriculum.co.uk/deal-with-complex-situations-on-the-shop-floor/
5. Aronson L. Reflection in medicine: Models and application. Med Teach. 2011;33(3):201-5.
6. Higher-Training-ARCP-2022-23-Requirement-Guide [Internet]. HEE KSS. [cited 2024 May 20]. Available from: https://kss.hee.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/sites/15/2023/11/Higher-Training-ARCP-2022-23-Requirement-Guide.docx
7. Vincent A, Creteur J. 'MORAL balance' decision-making in critical care. Crit Care. 2021 Jan 12;25(1):21.
8. Emergency Department Crowding: High Impact Solutions [Internet]. ACEP. [cited 2024 May 20]. Available from: https://www.acep.org/siteassets/sites/acep/media/crowding/empc_crowding-ip_092016.pdf
9. The assessment of non-technical skills in the emergency department. Emerg Med J. 2010;27(Suppl 1):A2.3.
10. A guide to non-technical skills in emergency management [Internet]. ResearchGate. [cited 2024 May 20]. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/359519342_A_guide_to_non-technical_skills_in_emergency_management
11. Zauher M, Muhr T, Praxmarer S, et al. A review of tools and methods in the teaching and assessment of nontechnical skills in emergency medicine training. J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2023;20:33.
12. Downey LV, Zun LS, Gonzales SJ. Management of the aggressive emergency department patient: non-pharmacological perspectives and evidence base. J Emerg Med. 2019;57(5):619-27.
13. Violent Behaviour in the ED [Internet]. RCEMLearning. [cited 2024 May 20]. Available from: https://www.rcemlearning.co.uk/reference/violent-behaviour-in-the-ed/
14. Conflict in the Workplace [Internet]. Health Education England. [cited 2024 May 20]. Available from: https://london.hee.nhs.uk/sites/default/files/conflict.pdf
15. Conflict Resolution eLearning Course [Internet]. Skills for Health. [cited 2024 May 20]. Available from: https://skillsforhealth.learnspace.org/shop/conflict-resolution
16. NHS Conflict Resolution Training Courses [Internet]. IKON Training. [cited 2024 May 20]. Available from: https://ikontraining.co.uk/courses/nhs/conflict-resolution/
17. Nursing Conflict Scenario Examples [Internet]. Conflict Resolution Training. [cited 2024 May 20]. Available from: https://conflict-resolution-training.com/blog/nursing-conflict-scenario-examples/
18. Ethical dilemmas in Emergency Medicine 4: The ethics of triage [Internet]. St.Emlyn's. [cited 2024 May 20]. Available from: https://www.stemlynsblog.org/ethical-dilemmas-emergency-medicine-part-4-triage-basically-rationing-healthcare/
19. Ethics in Health Care: Improving Patient Outcomes [Internet]. Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine. [cited 2024 May 20]. Available from: https://publichealth.tulane.edu/blog/ethics-in-healthcare/
20. Ethical Scenarios in NHS Interviews [Internet]. BDI Resourcing. [cited 2024 May 20]. Available from: https://www.bdiresourcing.com/img-media-hub/blog/ethical-scenarios-in-nhs-interviews/
21. Chin-Yee B, Bidiscombe M, Warmington A, et al. Reflection-Based Learning for Professional Ethical Formation. AMA J Ethics. 2017 Apr 1;19(4):391-7.
22. Reducing emergency department crowding through predictive data analytics – flow|ER [Internet]. The Health Foundation. [cited 2024 May 20]. Available from: https://www.health.org.uk/funding-and-fellowships/projects/reducing-emergency-department-crowding-through-predictive-data
23. Sanchez M, Smally AJ, Grant RJ, et al. Improving emergency department patient flow. Ann Emerg Med. 2016 Oct;68(4):465-71.
24. Urgent and emergency care acute patient flow [Internet]. NHS England. [cited 2024 May 20]. Available from: https://www.england.nhs.uk/long-read/urgent-and-emergency-care-acute-patient-flow/
25. Rough Guide to Curriculum [Internet]. UK Foundation Programme. [cited 2024 May 20]. Available from: https://foundationprogramme.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2024/05/Rough-Guide-to-Curriculum.doc-FINAL.pdf
26. Critical Reflection [Internet]. Writing and Communication Centre, University of Waterloo. [cited 2024 May 20]. Available from: https://uwaterloo.ca/writing-and-communication-centre/critical-reflection
27. Examples of Reflective Practice [Video]. YouTube; 2018. Available from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qQJ4gupvr-27
28. Reflecting on critical incidents [Internet]. Student Academic Success, Monash University. [cited 2024 May 20]. Available from: https://www.monash.edu/student-academic-success/excel-at-writing/annotated-assessment-samples/medicine-nursing-and-health-sciences/mnhs-reflective-writing-and-critical-incidents/four-tips-for-reflecting-on-critical-incidents
29. Raemer DB, Anderson M. Debriefing Techniques Utilized in Medical Simulation. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024 Jan-. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK546660/
30. Simulation Scenarios [Internet]. AORN. [cited 2024 May 20]. Available from: https://www.aorn.org/education/staff-development/simulation-scenarios
31. Walker CA, McGregor L, Taylor C, et al. Promoting hot debriefing in an emergency department. BMJ Open Qual. 2020;9(3):e000913.
32. Emergency Department Directors Academy (EDDA) [Internet]. ACEP. [cited 2024 May 20]. Available from: https://www.acep.org/edda

---------------------------------------------------------------------

MEM-EM PODCAST

2.7 Mastery of SLO 7 Complex and Challenging Situations 

                                                                         Apple podcast

Spotify Podcast

Amazon Music 

  You Tube Music Podcasts