Mastering RCEM SLO 9 "Support, supervise and educate": A Practical Guide
Executive Summary
Specialist
Learning Outcome (SLO) 9, "Support, supervise and educate," is a
fundamental component of the 2021 Royal College of Emergency Medicine (RCEM)
curriculum, marking the trainee's transition from a pure clinician to an
integrated leader and educator [1]. Achieving competence in SLO 9 requires
demonstrating the ability to safely delegate tasks, provide constructive
feedback, facilitate learning within the clinical environment, and support the
wellbeing of the multidisciplinary team. Excellence in this domain involves
progressing to educational leadership, evidenced by activities such as
evaluating teaching, championing multi-professional education, leading
debriefs, and creating educational resources.
The core
of SLO 9 is structured around three pillars: Support (pastoral care and
team wellbeing), Supervise (maintaining patient safety through effective
clinical oversight and delegation), and Educate (formal and informal
teaching). Evidence for these competencies should be collected proactively and
integrated into daily clinical shifts rather than waiting for formal teaching
opportunities. Key strategies include using ACATs to assess leadership, conducting
brief "sniper" teaching observations on the shop floor, and
reflecting on the delivery of feedback. Trainees must meet specific, escalating
expectations as they progress from ACCS to Higher Specialty Training (HST),
with a focus shifting from basic teaching skills to leading the department and
formal educational leadership.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Understanding the Three Pillars of SLO 9
SLO 9 is
a core professional role for any doctor, encompassing the education of
patients, future doctors, and allied health professionals. It is built upon
three distinct but interconnected pillars that define the responsibilities of a
senior clinician.
A. Support (Pastoral & Wellbeing)
- Core Task: Ensuring the physical and
psychological safety of the team. This involves creating an environment of
psychological safety where learners feel empowered to ask questions and
share uncertainties, which is crucial for patient safety and deep
learning.
- Key Actions:
- Recognising signs of
burnout or struggle in colleagues.
- Providing mentorship to
junior doctors or medical students.
- Leading "Hot
Debriefs" following critical incidents using structured protocols
like STOP5 [2], TALK [3] or TAKE STOCK.
B. Supervise (Clinical Oversight)
- Core Task: Maintaining patient safety
while enabling junior colleagues to develop their clinical skills and
resilience. This includes allowing trainees exposure to sick patients in
an assisting capacity to build experience in stressful situations.
- Key Actions:
- Effective Delegation: Matching clinical tasks to
the junior's specific capabilities.
- Departmental Management: "Running the
board" to manage patient flow while remaining accessible for advice
and support.
- Remote Review: Diligently checking
investigations like ECGs and X-rays that have been provisionally signed
off by junior staff.
C. Educate (Teaching & Training)
- Core Task: Facilitating learning in
both formal and informal clinical settings. Every interaction with a
learner presents a brief opportunity for a teaching encounter.
- Key Actions:
- Shop-Floor Teaching: Capitalising on the
"teachable moment" during clinical work.
- Formal Teaching: Delivering didactic
lectures, leading simulation sessions, or contributing to departmental
teaching rotas.
- Assessment: For HST trainees,
completing Workplace-Based Assessments (WPBAs) for junior colleagues.
2. Requirements and Progression Through Training
Competency
in SLO 9 is developed progressively. Trainees must plan to develop their style
and competencies across a range of scenarios to meet the specific entrustment
decisions required at the end of each training stage.
Formative Assessment and Evidence
Evidence
to inform decisions at each stage of training is gathered through a variety of
assessments and reports:
- Multi-Consultant Report
(MCR)
- Multi-Source Feedback (MSF)
- Teaching Observation (TO)
- Supervised Teaching and
Training (STAT)
- Acute Care Assessment Tool
(ACAT)
- Extended Supervised Learning
Event (ESLE)
- Relevant training courses
- Educational Supervisor’s
Report (ESR)
- Reflection on challenging
encounters and feedback received
ACCS (Core and Intermediate Training)
- Focus: Developing foundational
teaching skills and supervising junior learners like medical students and
Emergency Nurse Practitioners (ENPs).
- End of Core Training
Capabilities:
- Understand and identify key
non-technical skills in their own practice and that of peers.
- Deliver effective feedback
to junior colleagues or students during the supervision of simple
clinical skills (e.g., phlebotomy).
- End of Intermediate Training
Capabilities:
- Demonstrate a comprehensive
understanding of the impact of non-technical skills and human factors on
patient safety.
- Understand the role of
debriefing and have experience facilitating a debrief in simulation.
- Be ready to supervise
junior doctors, identifying gaps in their knowledge, performance, and
competence.
- Provide evidence of
delivering teaching sessions on clinical topics to peers, supported by
feedback and reflection.
- Suggested Evidence: TO2 (Teaching Observation),
reflections on feedback delivery.
HST (Higher Specialty Training)
- Focus: Leading the clinical
department, formally supervising junior doctors, and demonstrating
educational leadership.
- End of HST Capabilities:
- Lead the clinical team and
manage the departmental workload effectively.
- Supervise a range of
practitioners, including F2s, ACCS trainees, and ACPs.
- Conduct WPBAs for junior
trainees.
- Develop confidence in
delivering constructive feedback in formal settings like ALS/ATLS/APLS
courses.
- Provide detailed, specific,
and constructive feedback to juniors on leadership and non-technical
skills (e.g., within an ESLE).
- Deliver teaching sessions
on complex topics such as management or leadership.
- Suggested Evidence: ACAT (with a focus on
leadership), multiple TO2s, ESLE, evidence of contributions to
departmental teaching rotas.
Summary Checklist for ARCP
|
Requirement |
ACCS |
HST |
|
Teaching
Observation (TO2) |
Min 1
(Rec 2) |
Min 2 |
|
Feedback
Methodology |
Reflected
upon |
Demonstrated |
|
Supervision
Evidence |
Medical
Students |
Juniors
/ Team |
|
Debriefing |
Participant |
Leader |
|
Faculty
Statement |
Supported |
Independent |
3. Practical Strategies for Evidencing Competence
Evidence
collection for SLO 9 should be integrated into daily shifts to ensure a rich
and varied portfolio.
- The "Shop Floor"
ACAT: Use
the ACAT not just for clinical cases, but to demonstrate leadership. Ask a
consultant to observe a period of running a clinical area, focusing on
delegation strategies, supervision of junior colleagues, and clinical
oversight (e.g., identifying a missed diagnosis). This can be tagged with
"Assessment of learning needs" and "Supervision."
- The "Sniper" TO2: A Teaching Observation does
not require a one-hour lecture. A 10-minute, high-impact teaching
interaction on the shop floor—such as demonstrating a wrist reduction or
interpreting a complex blood gas—can be observed by a senior colleague and
recorded as a TO2. This is often valued more highly than formal classroom
teaching.
- The "Feedback"
Reflection: A
powerful piece of evidence is a written reflection on delivering difficult
feedback. Document the context (e.g., a junior colleague's persistent
lateness or a missed diagnosis), the method used (e.g., Pendleton's rules
or Agenda-Led Outcome-Based Analysis), and the outcome of the
conversation.
- Leverage RCEMLearning: Utilise RCEM Learning
content relevant to SLO 9. Completing modules, SBAs, or SAQs automatically
provides a certificate of completion in the CPD Diary. All activities
should be documented with a reflection, which is highly valued for both
training and revalidation.
4. Moving from Competent to Excellent
To
achieve the highest scores at the Faculty Educational Governance (FEG)
statement, trainees must demonstrate educational leadership.
- Close the Loop on Teaching: Do not just deliver a
teaching session. Actively collect feedback from participants, summarise
the findings, and write a reflection detailing how the feedback will
inform future teaching style. Upload this entire bundle as a single,
powerful piece of evidence.
- Champion Multi-Professional
Education:
Emergency medicine is a team-based specialty. Organise and lead
inter-professional simulation sessions involving nurses, paramedics, and
other team members. Evidence the ability to facilitate a debrief that
successfully flattens hierarchical gradients.
- Become a "Hot
Debrief" Leader: Proactively initiate and lead debriefs after
major clinical events like cardiac arrests or traumas. Use a structured
tool like the TAKE STOCK or TALK framework [3] and evidence this through a
reflection or a Case-Based Discussion (CBD) focused on team management
rather than pure clinical medicine.
- Create Enduring Educational
Resources:
Move from being a consumer of guidelines to a creator. Develop a "One
Page Guide," cognitive aid, or departmental guide (e.g., "How to
set up the NIV machine"). This demonstrates a sophisticated
understanding of systems-based learning and contributes lasting value to
the department.
5. Key Frameworks and Common Pitfalls
The SLO 9 Toolkit: Useful Frameworks
- For Feedback:
- Pendleton’s Rules [4]: A simple structure asking
"What went well?" followed by "What could be done
differently?"
- SET-GO [6]: A more detailed model:
What was Seen, what was Elicited, what are your Thoughts,
what is the Goal, and what do you Offer.
- For Procedural Teaching:
- Peyton’s 4-Step Approach
[7]:
Ideal for skills training: 1. Demonstration, 2. Deconstruction, 3.
Comprehension, 4. Execution.
- The OASIS
framework mandates simulation preparation at
critical transitional stages (see achieving SLO 6 briefing).
- For Supervision:
- Kennedy’s Framework [8]: Differentiates between
"Clinical Oversight" and "Clinical Supervision."
- For Debriefing:
- TAKE STOCK: A model for hot
debrief and identifying QI themes (see post on CRM)
- STOP5 [2]: A model for hot debriefs
after resuscitation cases.
- TALK [3]: A simple, structured tool
for clinical debriefing.
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
- The "Imposter"
Supervisor:
Feeling insufficiently senior to intervene when a junior colleague is
struggling.
- Solution: Reflect on and practice
"Graded Assertiveness" to ensure patient safety is maintained.
- The "Dump"
Delegate:
Assigning tasks to juniors without explaining the rationale or identifying
the learning objective.
- Solution: Use the "What
if?" questioning technique to check understanding and frame the task
as a learning opportunity.
- Ignoring the Environment: Attempting to teach complex
topics when the department is unsafe or overcrowded.
- Solution: Demonstrate maturity by
evidencing the ability to correctly prioritise immediate service
provision over teaching when the clinical situation demands it.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
References
- Royal College of Emergency
Medicine. RCEM Curriculum 2021: Specialty Learning Outcomes. London: RCEM;
2021.
- Walker CA, et al. STOP5: a
hot debrief model for resuscitation cases in the emergency department.
Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2020;7(4):259-266.
- Diaz-Navarro C,
Leon-Castelao E, Hadfield A, Pierce S, Sorkin A. TALK: a simple tool for
clinical debriefing. Journal of the Association of Anaesthetists of Great
Britain and Ireland. 2014.
- Pendleton D, Schofield T,
Tate P, Havelock P. The Consultation: An Approach to Learning and
Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1984.
- Kurtz S, Silverman J, Draper
J. Teaching and Learning Communication Skills in Medicine. 2nd ed. Oxford:
Radcliffe Publishing; 2005.
- Chowdhury R, Kalu G.
Learning to give feedback in medical education. The Obstetrician &
Gynaecologist. 2004;6(4):243-247.
- Peyton JWR. Teaching and
Learning in Medical Practice. Rickmansworth: Manticore Europe Limited;
1998.
- Kennedy I. Learning from
Bristol: the report of the public inquiry into children's heart surgery at
the Bristol Royal Infirmary 1984-1995. London: The Stationery Office;
2001.
No comments:
Post a Comment